Here is a nice post form my friend, and social networking expert, Valdis Krebs. In Networks, Patterns & Paintings he discusses how network patterns experts are applying their algorithms to a group of recently found paintings -- suspected to be by Jackson Pollock. Valdis wrote that an initial study of these paintings cast doubt on their authenticity. Now, a group of physicists from Cleveland's Case Western Reserve University have come out with what they say is a better analysis. They conclude that “by analyzing paintings by Pollock and others, that fractal criteria provide no information about artistic authenticity.” Still it was an interesting idea. I guess we have to leave authenticity to more subjective analysis.
Valids leaves the question open and closes with ths. “We as humans leave behind repeated patterns and motifs in our architecture, music, writing, and social networks... so why not in how we paint?”